NVDS vs SDS

NVDS vs SDS

Which is better, NVDS or SDS?

SDS has been ahead.

SDS has a lower expense ratio. SDS led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: SDSHigher Returns: SDS

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricNVDSSDS
Expense Ratio1.15%0.91%Best
AUM$11M$329M
Dividend Yield21.23%5.55%
Holdings620
YTD Return-34.87%-20.91%Best
1Y Return-37.45%-24.66%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-63.83%-30.73%Best
5Y Return (annualized)--21.89%
Volatility (annualized)52.7%27.4%Best
Max Drawdown--77.1%
$10,000 over 4.2 years$85$2,549Best
Fund FamilyTradr ETFsProShares
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleTrading-Inverse EquityTrading-Inverse Equity
InceptionJul 13, 2022Jul 11, 2006

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 14, 2022 to Oct 12, 2026 (4.2 years).

NVDS vs SDS growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.2 years both funds cover.

Compare NVDS against instead:NVDS vs SPYNVDS vs QQQNVDS vs VOONVDS vs VTISDS against:SDS vs VXUS

NVDS vs SDS Performance

Tradr 1.5X Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVDS) is an ETF from Tradr ETFs and ProShares UltraShort S&P500 (SDS) is an ETF from ProShares. Over the past year NVDS returned -37.45% while SDS returned -24.66%. Year to date, NVDS is down 34.87% versus a loss of 20.91% for SDS.

Over three years, NVDS compounded at -63.83% per year against -30.73% for SDS. Across the full 4-year window we track, SDS has the edge at -27.78% annualized vs -67.87%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

NVDS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 52.7% compared with 27.4% for SDS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

NVDS charges 1.15% per year while SDS charges 0.91%. On a $10,000 position that is $115 vs $91 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NVDS currently yields 21.23% against 5.55% for SDS.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of NVDS and SDS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

NVDSSDS

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, NVDS or SDS?

NVDS has an expense ratio of 1.15% while SDS charges 0.91%. SDS is the cheaper option, by $24 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, NVDS or SDS?

Over the past year NVDS returned -37.45% vs -24.66% for SDS, so SDS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), NVDS annualized -67.87% vs -27.78% for SDS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, NVDS or SDS?

NVDS has been the more volatile fund at 52.7% annualized versus 27.4% for SDS.

Should I hold both NVDS and SDS?

NVDS and SDS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, NVDS or SDS?

NVDS yields 21.23% while SDS yields 5.55%, so NVDS currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is SDS better than NVDS?

SDS has a lower expense ratio. SDS led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.