NXTE vs VOO
AXS Green Alpha ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, NXTE or VOO?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. NXTE led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NXTE | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $53M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.56% | 1.08% |
| Holdings | 60 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +21.62%Best | +13.37% |
| 1Y Return | +39.13%Best | +20.08% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.74% | +21.29%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.89% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 27.3% | 13.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -28.6% | -18.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.9 years | $16,567 | $22,228Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 55.0% | 36.4%Best |
| Fund Family | AXS Investments | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 27, 2022 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 29, 2022 to Sep 4, 2026 (3.9 years).
NXTE vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.9 years both funds cover.
NXTE vs VOO Performance
AXS Green Alpha ETF (NXTE) is an ETF from AXS Investments and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NXTE returned +39.13% while VOO returned +20.08%. Year to date, NXTE is up 21.62% versus a gain of 13.37% for VOO.
Over three years, NXTE compounded at +16.74% per year against +21.29% for VOO. Across the full 4-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +22.73% annualized vs +13.82%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NXTE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.3% compared with 13.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -28.6% for NXTE and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NXTE charges 1.00% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $3 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NXTE currently yields 0.56% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
26.6% of NXTE's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 3.4% of VOO's money is in holdings NXTE also owns.
NXTE and VOO share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 49 days apart, NXTE as of Aug 18, 2026 and VOO as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
11 positions in common, counted across the 53 positions we hold weights for in NXTE and 504 in VOO, against full books of 60 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 483 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for NXTE (96.0% of the fund), and 31 for NXTE that do not appear in VOO (27.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in NXTE | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 4.60% | 0.89% | 3.71% |
| LRCXLam Research Corp | 4.63% | 0.84% | 3.79% |
| IBMIntl Business Machines Corp | 3.83% | 0.41% | 3.42% |
| QCOMQualcomm | 2.42% | 0.30% | 2.12% |
| DLRDigital Realty Trust Inc. | 2.40% | 0.09% | 2.31% |
| EQIXEquinix Inc - Common | 1.96% | 0.16% | 1.80% |
| MRNAMrna Uw Equity | 1.77% | 0.04% | 1.73% |
| ADIAnalog Devices, Inc. | 1.40% | 0.30% | 1.10% |
| BXPBoston Properties Inc | 1.41% | 0.02% | 1.39% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc - A | 1.02% | 0.30% | 0.72% |
26.6% of NXTE is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NXTE or VOO?
NXTE has an expense ratio of 1.00% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $97 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, NXTE or VOO?
Over the past year NXTE returned +39.13% vs +20.08% for VOO, so NXTE leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), NXTE annualized +13.82% vs +22.73% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NXTE or VOO?
NXTE has been the more volatile fund at 27.3% annualized versus 13.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: NXTE -28.6% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both NXTE and VOO?
NXTE and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between NXTE and VOO?
26.6% of NXTE's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 3.4% of VOO's is in holdings NXTE also owns. They hold 11 positions in common, counted across the 53 positions we hold weights for in NXTE and 504 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, NXTE or VOO?
NXTE yields 0.56% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than NXTE?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. NXTE led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.