OSCX vs VTI
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long OSCR ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, OSCX or VTI?
Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. OSCX led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OSCX | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.31% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $9M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 18 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +128.16%Best | +13.10% |
| 1Y Return | +19.31%Best | +17.01% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.26% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.98% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 173.8% | 13.0%Best |
| Fund Family | Defiance ETFs, LLC | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 24, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
OSCX vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
OSCX vs VTI Performance
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long OSCR ETF (OSCX) is an ETF from Defiance ETFs, LLC and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year OSCX returned +19.31% while VTI returned +17.01%. Year to date, OSCX is up 128.16% versus a gain of 13.10% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
OSCX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 173.8% compared with 13.0% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OSCX charges 1.31% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $131 vs $3 annually, a gap of $128 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OSCX currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in OSCX and 3,463 in VTI, totalling 10.7% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in OSCX and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 18 and 3,543.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of OSCX and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OSCX or VTI?
OSCX has an expense ratio of 1.31% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $128 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, OSCX or VTI?
Over the past year OSCX returned +19.31% vs +17.01% for VTI, so OSCX leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, OSCX or VTI?
OSCX has been the more volatile fund at 173.8% annualized versus 13.0% for VTI.
Should I hold both OSCX and VTI?
OSCX and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, OSCX or VTI?
OSCX yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than OSCX?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. OSCX led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.