PAWZ vs SCHD
Proshares Pet Care ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 104 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PAWZ | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $34M | $108.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.69% | 3.13% | |
| Holdings | 28 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | -2.61% | +28.70% | |
| 1Y Return | -8.17% | +32.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +2.66% | +17.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -8.03% | +10.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.8% | 13.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -50.1% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 5, 2018 | Oct 20, 2011 |
PAWZ vs SCHD Performance
Proshares Pet Care ETF (PAWZ) is a ETF from ProShares and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year PAWZ returned -8.17% while SCHD returned +32.27%. Year to date, PAWZ is down 2.61% versus a gain of 28.70% for SCHD.
Over three years, PAWZ compounded at +2.66% per year against +17.27% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are -8.03% and +10.23% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.63% annualized vs +4.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PAWZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.8% compared with 13.7% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.1% for PAWZ and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PAWZ charges 0.50% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $6 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PAWZ currently yields 0.69% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PAWZ or SCHD?
PAWZ has an expense ratio of 0.50% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $44 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PAWZ or SCHD?
Over the past year PAWZ returned -8.17% vs +32.27% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), PAWZ annualized +4.07% vs +11.63% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PAWZ or SCHD?
PAWZ has been the more volatile fund at 21.8% annualized versus 13.7% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: PAWZ -50.1% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both PAWZ and SCHD?
PAWZ and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PAWZ and SCHD?
PAWZ and SCHD share 2 common holdings with a 4.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 125 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PAWZ or SCHD?
PAWZ yields 0.69% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.