PAWZ vs VXUS
Proshares Pet Care ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PAWZ | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $34M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.69% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 28 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -3.44% | +14.33% | |
| 1Y Return | -9.46% | +25.32% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +2.21% | +20.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -8.04% | +9.72% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -50.1% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 5, 2018 | Jan 26, 2011 |
PAWZ vs VXUS Performance
Proshares Pet Care ETF (PAWZ) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PAWZ returned -9.46% while VXUS returned +25.32%. Year to date, PAWZ is down 3.44% versus a gain of 14.33% for VXUS.
Over three years, PAWZ compounded at +2.21% per year against +20.47% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are -8.04% and +9.72% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.84% annualized vs +3.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PAWZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.7% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.1% for PAWZ and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PAWZ charges 0.50% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $5 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PAWZ currently yields 0.69% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
PAWZ and VXUS share 7 holdings out of 7889 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PAWZ or VXUS?
PAWZ has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $45 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PAWZ or VXUS?
Over the past year PAWZ returned -9.46% vs +25.32% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), PAWZ annualized +3.96% vs +4.84% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PAWZ or VXUS?
PAWZ has been the more volatile fund at 21.7% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: PAWZ -50.1% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both PAWZ and VXUS?
PAWZ and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PAWZ and VXUS?
PAWZ and VXUS share 7 common holdings with a 0.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7889 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PAWZ or VXUS?
PAWZ yields 0.69% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.