PAWZ vs VYM
Proshares Pet Care ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PAWZ | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $34M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.69% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 28 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | -2.61% | +15.34% | |
| 1Y Return | -8.17% | +23.24% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +2.66% | +19.22% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -8.03% | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.8% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -50.1% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 5, 2018 | Nov 10, 2006 |
PAWZ vs VYM Performance
Proshares Pet Care ETF (PAWZ) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PAWZ returned -8.17% while VYM returned +23.24%. Year to date, PAWZ is down 2.61% versus a gain of 15.34% for VYM.
Over three years, PAWZ compounded at +2.66% per year against +19.22% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are -8.03% and +12.21% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.04% annualized vs +4.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PAWZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.8% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.1% for PAWZ and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PAWZ charges 0.50% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $4 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PAWZ currently yields 0.69% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
PAWZ and VYM share 6 holdings out of 624 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PAWZ or VYM?
PAWZ has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PAWZ or VYM?
Over the past year PAWZ returned -8.17% vs +23.24% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), PAWZ annualized +4.07% vs +7.04% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PAWZ or VYM?
PAWZ has been the more volatile fund at 21.8% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: PAWZ -50.1% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both PAWZ and VYM?
PAWZ and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PAWZ and VYM?
PAWZ and VYM share 6 common holdings with a 1.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 624 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PAWZ or VYM?
PAWZ yields 0.69% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.