PAWZ vs VTI
Proshares Pet Care ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PAWZ | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $34M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.69% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 28 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -2.03% | +13.12% | |
| 1Y Return | -7.13% | +20.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +2.92% | +21.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -7.96% | +11.84% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.8% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -50.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 5, 2018 | May 24, 2001 |
PAWZ vs VTI Performance
Proshares Pet Care ETF (PAWZ) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PAWZ returned -7.13% while VTI returned +20.82%. Year to date, PAWZ is down 2.03% versus a gain of 13.12% for VTI.
Over three years, PAWZ compounded at +2.92% per year against +21.43% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -7.96% and +11.84% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.08% annualized vs +4.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PAWZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.8% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.1% for PAWZ and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PAWZ charges 0.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PAWZ currently yields 0.69% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
PAWZ and VTI share 13 holdings out of 2801 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PAWZ or VTI?
PAWZ has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PAWZ or VTI?
Over the past year PAWZ returned -7.13% vs +20.82% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), PAWZ annualized +4.14% vs +8.08% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PAWZ or VTI?
PAWZ has been the more volatile fund at 21.8% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: PAWZ -50.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both PAWZ and VTI?
PAWZ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PAWZ and VTI?
PAWZ and VTI share 13 common holdings with a 0.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2801 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PAWZ or VTI?
PAWZ yields 0.69% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.