PAWZ vs VOO
Proshares Pet Care ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, PAWZ or VOO?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 70.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PAWZ | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $34M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.67% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 27 | 509 |
| YTD Return | -10.56% | +11.48%Best |
| 1Y Return | -13.21% | +15.94%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +2.31% | +21.01%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -9.07% | +12.66%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.7% | 16.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -50.1% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $6,216 | $18,149Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 70.3% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 5, 2018 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 6, 2018 to Sep 15, 2026 (7.9 years).
PAWZ vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.9 years both funds cover.
PAWZ vs VOO Performance
Proshares Pet Care ETF (PAWZ) is an ETF from ProShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PAWZ returned -13.21% while VOO returned +15.94%. Year to date, PAWZ is down 10.56% versus a gain of 11.48% for VOO.
Over three years, PAWZ compounded at +2.31% per year against +21.01% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -9.07% and +12.66% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +14.89% annualized vs +2.91%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PAWZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.7% compared with 16.8% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.1% for PAWZ and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PAWZ charges 0.50% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PAWZ currently yields 0.67% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
32.8% of PAWZ's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 0.9% of VOO's money is in holdings PAWZ also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
8 positions in common, counted across the 27 positions we hold weights for in PAWZ and 494 in VOO, against full books of 27 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 479 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for PAWZ (98.3% of the fund), and 9 for PAWZ that do not appear in VOO (33.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PAWZ | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZTSZoetis Inc, Class A | 10.35% | 0.05% | 10.30% |
| IDXXIdexx Labs | 10.01% | 0.07% | 9.94% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 4.85% | 0.50% | 4.35% |
| CLColgate-Palmolive Co | 2.89% | 0.11% | 2.78% |
| CORCencora Inc | 2.48% | 0.09% | 2.39% |
| GISGeneral Mills In | 0.89% | 0.03% | 0.86% |
| TSCOTractor Supply Co. | 0.73% | 0.03% | 0.70% |
| SJMJ M Smucker Co/The | 0.55% | 0.02% | 0.53% |
32.8% of PAWZ is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PAWZ or VOO?
PAWZ has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PAWZ or VOO?
Over the past year PAWZ returned -13.21% vs +15.94% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), PAWZ annualized +2.91% vs +14.89% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PAWZ or VOO?
PAWZ has been the more volatile fund at 21.7% annualized versus 16.8% for VOO. Worst drawdown: PAWZ -50.1% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both PAWZ and VOO?
PAWZ and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between PAWZ and VOO?
32.8% of PAWZ's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 0.9% of VOO's is in holdings PAWZ also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 27 positions we hold weights for in PAWZ and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, PAWZ or VOO?
PAWZ yields 0.67% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than PAWZ?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 70.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.