PBSC vs QQQ
Pacer Barings Secured Credit Flex ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, PBSC or QQQ?
Bank Loan against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PBSC | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $101M | $498.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.75% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 201 | 321 |
| YTD Return | +0.42% | +22.67%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +24.33% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +29.05% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.00% |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Bank Loan | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 22, 2026 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
PBSC vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
PBSC vs QQQ Performance
Pacer Barings Secured Credit Flex ETF (PBSC) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, PBSC is up 0.42% versus a gain of 22.67% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PBSC charges 0.49% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $18 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PBSC currently yields 0.75% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 128 holdings in PBSC and 102 in QQQ, totalling 44.6% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 128 positions we hold weights for in PBSC and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 201 and 321.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of PBSC and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PBSC or QQQ?
PBSC has an expense ratio of 0.49% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $31 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, PBSC or QQQ?
PBSC yields 0.75% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so PBSC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than PBSC?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.