PHDG vs TYLG
Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF vs Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF
Quick Verdict
PHDG has a lower expense ratio. TYLG delivered stronger 1-year returns. PHDG offers more diversification with 514 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PHDG | TYLG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.60% | |
| AUM | $63M | $15M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.69% | 8.89% | |
| Holdings | 514 | 78 | |
| YTD Return | +10.70% | +20.94% | |
| 1Y Return | +15.16% | +34.81% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.75% | +23.52% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.11% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.9% | 15.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.6% | -24.5% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Global X by mirae Asset | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Dec 5, 2012 | Nov 21, 2022 |
PHDG vs TYLG Performance
Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF (PHDG) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF (TYLG) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year PHDG returned +15.16% while TYLG returned +34.81%. Year to date, PHDG is up 10.70% versus a gain of 20.94% for TYLG.
Over three years, PHDG compounded at +9.75% per year against +23.52% for TYLG. Across the full 4-year window we track, TYLG has the edge at +25.07% annualized vs +4.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TYLG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.8% compared with 9.9% for PHDG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.6% for PHDG and -24.5% for TYLG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PHDG charges 0.39% per year while TYLG charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $60 annually, a gap of $21 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PHDG currently yields 1.69% against 8.89% for TYLG.
Holdings Overlap
PHDG and TYLG share 70 holdings out of 498 unique holdings combined, representing a 27.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PHDG or TYLG?
PHDG has an expense ratio of 0.39% while TYLG charges 0.60%. PHDG is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $21 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PHDG or TYLG?
Over the past year PHDG returned +15.16% vs +34.81% for TYLG, so TYLG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), PHDG annualized +4.28% vs +25.07% for TYLG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PHDG or TYLG?
TYLG has been the more volatile fund at 15.8% annualized versus 9.9% for PHDG. Worst drawdown: PHDG -23.6% vs TYLG -24.5%.
Should I hold both PHDG and TYLG?
PHDG and TYLG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PHDG and TYLG?
PHDG and TYLG share 70 common holdings with a 27.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 498 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PHDG or TYLG?
PHDG yields 1.69% while TYLG yields 8.89%, so TYLG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.