PRNT vs QQQ
The 3D Printing ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PRNT | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.66% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $59M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.73% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 44 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +13.65% | +17.30% | |
| 1Y Return | +15.66% | +24.93% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.55% | +26.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -7.26% | +15.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.2% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -66.1% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Ark Invest | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 18, 2016 | Mar 10, 1999 |
PRNT vs QQQ Performance
The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) is a ETF from Ark Invest and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year PRNT returned +15.66% while QQQ returned +24.93%. Year to date, PRNT is up 13.65% versus a gain of 17.30% for QQQ.
Over three years, PRNT compounded at +6.55% per year against +26.19% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are -7.26% and +15.34% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.06% annualized vs +2.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 26.2% for PRNT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -66.1% for PRNT and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PRNT charges 0.66% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $66 vs $18 annually, a gap of $48 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PRNT currently yields 0.73% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PRNT or QQQ?
PRNT has an expense ratio of 0.66% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $48 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PRNT or QQQ?
Over the past year PRNT returned +15.66% vs +24.93% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), PRNT annualized +2.87% vs +13.06% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PRNT or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 26.2% for PRNT. Worst drawdown: PRNT -66.1% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both PRNT and QQQ?
PRNT and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PRNT and QQQ?
PRNT and QQQ share 2 common holdings with a 0.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 143 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PRNT or QQQ?
PRNT yields 0.73% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so PRNT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.