PRNT vs VYM
The 3D Printing ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PRNT | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.66% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $59M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.73% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 44 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +17.44% | +16.42% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.41% | +24.22% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.68% | +19.03% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -6.99% | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.3% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -66.1% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Ark Invest | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 18, 2016 | Nov 10, 2006 |
PRNT vs VYM Performance
The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) is a ETF from Ark Invest and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PRNT returned +19.41% while VYM returned +24.22%. Year to date, PRNT is up 17.44% versus a gain of 16.42% for VYM.
Over three years, PRNT compounded at +6.68% per year against +19.03% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are -6.99% and +12.21% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.10% annualized vs +3.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PRNT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.3% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -66.1% for PRNT and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PRNT charges 0.66% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $66 vs $4 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PRNT currently yields 0.73% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
PRNT and VYM share 6 holdings out of 640 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PRNT or VYM?
PRNT has an expense ratio of 0.66% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PRNT or VYM?
Over the past year PRNT returned +19.41% vs +24.22% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), PRNT annualized +3.21% vs +7.10% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PRNT or VYM?
PRNT has been the more volatile fund at 26.3% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: PRNT -66.1% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both PRNT and VYM?
PRNT and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PRNT and VYM?
PRNT and VYM share 6 common holdings with a 0.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 640 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PRNT or VYM?
PRNT yields 0.73% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.