PRNT vs VXUS
The 3D Printing ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PRNT | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.66% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $59M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.73% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 44 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +17.44% | +15.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.41% | +26.86% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.68% | +20.34% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -6.99% | +9.38% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -66.1% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Ark Invest | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 18, 2016 | Jan 26, 2011 |
PRNT vs VXUS Performance
The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) is a ETF from Ark Invest and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PRNT returned +19.41% while VXUS returned +26.86%. Year to date, PRNT is up 17.44% versus a gain of 15.22% for VXUS.
Over three years, PRNT compounded at +6.68% per year against +20.34% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are -6.99% and +9.38% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.89% annualized vs +3.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PRNT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.3% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -66.1% for PRNT and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PRNT charges 0.66% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $66 vs $5 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PRNT currently yields 0.73% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
PRNT and VXUS share 9 holdings out of 7903 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PRNT or VXUS?
PRNT has an expense ratio of 0.66% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $61 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PRNT or VXUS?
Over the past year PRNT returned +19.41% vs +26.86% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), PRNT annualized +3.21% vs +4.89% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PRNT or VXUS?
PRNT has been the more volatile fund at 26.3% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: PRNT -66.1% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both PRNT and VXUS?
PRNT and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PRNT and VXUS?
PRNT and VXUS share 9 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7903 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PRNT or VXUS?
PRNT yields 0.73% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.