IVV vs PRNT
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs The 3D Printing ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | PRNT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.66% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $59M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.73% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 44 | |
| YTD Return | +13.74% | +15.16% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.54% | +17.20% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.61% | +7.04% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.31% | -6.98% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 26.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -66.1% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Ark Invest | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jul 18, 2016 |
IVV vs PRNT Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) is a ETF from Ark Invest. Over the past year IVV returned +21.54% while PRNT returned +17.20%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.74% versus a gain of 15.16% for PRNT.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.61% per year against +7.04% for PRNT; over five years the annualized figures are +13.31% and -6.98% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.04% annualized vs +3.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PRNT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.2% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -66.1% for PRNT. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while PRNT charges 0.66%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $66 annually, a gap of $63 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.73% for PRNT.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and PRNT share 10 holdings out of 538 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or PRNT?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while PRNT charges 0.66%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $63 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or PRNT?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.54% vs +17.20% for PRNT, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +3.01% for PRNT. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or PRNT?
PRNT has been the more volatile fund at 26.2% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs PRNT -66.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and PRNT?
IVV and PRNT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and PRNT?
IVV and PRNT share 10 common holdings with a 1.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 538 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or PRNT?
IVV yields 1.10% while PRNT yields 0.73%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.