IVV vs PRNT
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs The 3D Printing ETF
Which is better, IVV or PRNT?
Large Cap Blend against Mid Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | PRNT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.66% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $59M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.73% |
| Holdings | 508 | 44 |
| YTD Return | +11.57%Best | +6.56% |
| 1Y Return | +17.57%Best | +6.67% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.71%Best | +4.33% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.80%Best | -9.23% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3%Best | 26.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9%Best | -66.1% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,262Best | $6,162 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9%Best | 48.0% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Ark Invest |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Mid Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jul 18, 2016 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 19, 2016 to Sep 10, 2026 (10.1 years).
IVV vs PRNT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 10.1 years both funds cover.
IVV vs PRNT Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) is an ETF from Ark Invest. Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% while PRNT returned +6.67%. Year to date, IVV is up 11.57% versus a gain of 6.56% for PRNT.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +20.71% per year against +4.33% for PRNT; over five years the annualized figures are +12.80% and -9.23% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +14.01% annualized vs +2.20%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PRNT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.2% compared with 15.3% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -66.1% for PRNT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while PRNT charges 0.66%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $66 annually, a gap of $63 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.73% for PRNT.
Holdings Overlap
1.2% of IVV's money is in holdings PRNT also owns. 26.4% of PRNT's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
PRNT and IVV share little of their money.
10 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 43 in PRNT, against full books of 508 and 44.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 16 positions for PRNT that do not appear in our book for IVV (40.5% of the fund), and 485 for IVV that do not appear in PRNT (98.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in PRNT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| PTCPtc Inc | 0.02% | 5.36% | 5.34% |
| ADSKAutodesk, Inc. | 0.08% | 5.23% | 5.15% |
| SNPSSynopsys Inc. | 0.12% | 4.61% | 4.49% |
| HPQHp Inc. | 0.04% | 4.25% | 4.21% |
| GEGeneral Electric Co. | 0.60% | 1.77% | 1.17% |
| LHXL3Harris Technologies Inc. | 0.08% | 1.73% | 1.65% |
| AMEAmetek Inc. | 0.09% | 1.63% | 1.54% |
| ALGNAlign Technology Inc. | 0.02% | 1.54% | 1.52% |
| MMM3m Co. | 0.14% | 0.14% | 0.00% |
| JBLJabil, Inc. | 0.05% | 0.14% | 0.09% |
26.4% of PRNT is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or PRNT?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while PRNT charges 0.66%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $63 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or PRNT?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% vs +6.67% for PRNT, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), IVV annualized +14.01% vs +2.20% for PRNT. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or PRNT?
PRNT has been the more volatile fund at 26.2% annualized versus 15.3% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs PRNT -66.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and PRNT?
IVV and PRNT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and PRNT?
26.4% of PRNT's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 26.4% of PRNT's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 43 in PRNT.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or PRNT?
IVV yields 1.06% while PRNT yields 0.73%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PRNT better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.