PRNT vs VTI
The 3D Printing ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PRNT | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.66% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $59M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.73% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 44 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +13.65% | +13.38% | |
| 1Y Return | +15.66% | +21.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.55% | +21.85% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -7.26% | +12.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.2% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -66.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Ark Invest | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 18, 2016 | May 24, 2001 |
PRNT vs VTI Performance
The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) is a ETF from Ark Invest and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PRNT returned +15.66% while VTI returned +21.12%. Year to date, PRNT is up 13.65% versus a gain of 13.38% for VTI.
Over three years, PRNT compounded at +6.55% per year against +21.85% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -7.26% and +12.44% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.10% annualized vs +2.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PRNT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.2% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -66.1% for PRNT and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PRNT charges 0.66% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $66 vs $3 annually, a gap of $63 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PRNT currently yields 0.73% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
PRNT and VTI share 21 holdings out of 2809 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PRNT or VTI?
PRNT has an expense ratio of 0.66% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $63 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PRNT or VTI?
Over the past year PRNT returned +15.66% vs +21.12% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), PRNT annualized +2.87% vs +8.10% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PRNT or VTI?
PRNT has been the more volatile fund at 26.2% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: PRNT -66.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both PRNT and VTI?
PRNT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PRNT and VTI?
PRNT and VTI share 21 common holdings with a 1.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2809 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PRNT or VTI?
PRNT yields 0.73% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.