PSCU vs VOO
Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PSCU | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $17M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.96% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 40 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +13.00% | +13.44% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.95% | +22.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.46% | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.75% | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -30.4% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 7, 2010 | Sep 7, 2010 |
PSCU vs VOO Performance
Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF (PSCU) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PSCU returned +20.95% while VOO returned +22.62%. Year to date, PSCU is up 13.00% versus a gain of 13.44% for VOO.
Over three years, PSCU compounded at +6.46% per year against +21.47% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +0.75% and +13.27% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.55% annualized vs +6.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PSCU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -30.4% for PSCU and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PSCU charges 0.29% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $3 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PSCU currently yields 0.96% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
PSCU and VOO share 0 holdings out of 539 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PSCU or VOO?
PSCU has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $26 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PSCU or VOO?
Over the past year PSCU returned +20.95% vs +22.62% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), PSCU annualized +6.43% vs +13.55% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PSCU or VOO?
PSCU has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: PSCU -30.4% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both PSCU and VOO?
PSCU and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PSCU and VOO?
PSCU and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 539 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PSCU or VOO?
PSCU yields 0.96% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.