PSCU vs VTI
Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, PSCU or VTI?
Small Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PSCU | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $14M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.99% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 74 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +4.54% | +12.51%Best |
| 1Y Return | +5.14% | +15.23%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.37% | +22.50%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.49% | +12.31%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | 14.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -30.4%Best | -35.0% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $9,757 | $17,869Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 53.8% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 7, 2010 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 7, 2010 to Oct 1, 2026 (16.5 years).
PSCU vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16.5 years both funds cover.
PSCU vs VTI Performance
Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF (PSCU) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PSCU returned +5.14% while VTI returned +15.23%. Year to date, PSCU is up 4.54% versus a gain of 12.51% for VTI.
Over three years, PSCU compounded at +8.37% per year against +22.50% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -0.49% and +12.31% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +12.25% annualized vs +5.87%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PSCU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 14.9% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -30.4% for PSCU and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PSCU charges 0.29% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $3 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PSCU currently yields 0.99% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
92.1% of PSCU's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.1% of VTI's money is in holdings PSCU also owns.
Most of PSCU is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, PSCU as of Sep 15, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
32 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in PSCU and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 74 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,143 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for PSCU (97.4% of the fund), and 3 for PSCU that do not appear in VTI (7.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PSCU | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MTCHMatch Group Inc | 10.07% | 0.01% | 10.06% |
| MSGSMadison Square Garden Co/the | 7.18% | 0.00% | 7.18% |
| LUMNLumen Technologies Inc | 6.70% | 0.01% | 6.69% |
| VSNTVersant Media Group Inc-Wi | 5.34% | 0.01% | 5.33% |
| IRDMIridium Communications Inc | 5.09% | 0.01% | 5.08% |
| MDUMdu Resources | 4.12% | 0.01% | 4.11% |
| OTTROtter Tail Corp. | 3.76% | 0.01% | 3.75% |
| TDSTelephone And Data System Preferred Stock | 3.69% | 0.00% | 3.69% |
| CNKCinemark Usa Inc. | 3.67% | 0.01% | 3.66% |
| AWRAmerican States Water Co | 3.44% | 0.00% | 3.44% |
92.1% of PSCU is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PSCU or VTI?
PSCU has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $26 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PSCU or VTI?
Over the past year PSCU returned +5.14% vs +15.23% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), PSCU annualized +5.87% vs +12.25% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PSCU or VTI?
PSCU has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 14.9% for VTI. Worst drawdown: PSCU -30.4% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both PSCU and VTI?
PSCU and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between PSCU and VTI?
92.1% of PSCU's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.1% of VTI's is in holdings PSCU also owns. They hold 32 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in PSCU and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, PSCU or VTI?
PSCU yields 0.99% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than PSCU?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.