PSCU vs VTI
Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PSCU | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $18M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.99% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 36 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +13.84% | +13.38% | |
| 1Y Return | +18.48% | +21.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.67% | +21.85% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.13% | +12.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -30.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 7, 2010 | May 24, 2001 |
PSCU vs VTI Performance
Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF (PSCU) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PSCU returned +18.48% while VTI returned +21.12%. Year to date, PSCU is up 13.84% versus a gain of 13.38% for VTI.
Over three years, PSCU compounded at +8.67% per year against +21.85% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +1.13% and +12.44% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.10% annualized vs +6.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 15.3% for PSCU. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -30.4% for PSCU and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PSCU charges 0.29% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $3 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PSCU currently yields 0.99% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
PSCU and VTI share 31 holdings out of 2790 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PSCU or VTI?
PSCU has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $26 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PSCU or VTI?
Over the past year PSCU returned +18.48% vs +21.12% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), PSCU annualized +6.47% vs +8.10% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PSCU or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 15.3% for PSCU. Worst drawdown: PSCU -30.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both PSCU and VTI?
PSCU and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PSCU and VTI?
PSCU and VTI share 31 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2790 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PSCU or VTI?
PSCU yields 0.99% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.