PTF vs VTI
Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. PTF delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PTF | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $601M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.01% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 40 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +32.12% | +14.16% | |
| 1Y Return | +55.11% | +23.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +31.14% | +21.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.45% | +12.33% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 25.2% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -55.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 12, 2006 | May 24, 2001 |
PTF vs VTI Performance
Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PTF returned +55.11% while VTI returned +23.62%. Year to date, PTF is up 32.12% versus a gain of 14.16% for VTI.
Over three years, PTF compounded at +31.14% per year against +21.43% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +15.45% and +12.33% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, PTF has the edge at +13.63% annualized vs +8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PTF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25.2% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -55.4% for PTF and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PTF charges 0.60% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PTF currently yields 0.01% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
PTF and VTI share 31 holdings out of 2791 unique holdings combined, representing a 15.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PTF or VTI?
PTF has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PTF or VTI?
Over the past year PTF returned +55.11% vs +23.62% for VTI, so PTF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), PTF annualized +13.63% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PTF or VTI?
PTF has been the more volatile fund at 25.2% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: PTF -55.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both PTF and VTI?
PTF and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PTF and VTI?
PTF and VTI share 31 common holdings with a 15.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2791 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PTF or VTI?
PTF yields 0.01% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.