PYZ vs SPY
Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Which is better, PYZ or SPY?
Small Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
SPY has a lower expense ratio. PYZ led over 1Y, SPY over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. SPY is less concentrated, with 38.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PYZ | SPY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.09%Best |
| AUM | $75M | $814.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.50% | 1.01% |
| Holdings | 44 | 505 |
| YTD Return | +11.19% | +13.34%Best |
| 1Y Return | +22.57%Best | +19.97% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.57% | +21.20%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.94% | +12.81%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.0% | 15.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -65.7% | -56.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,653 | $18,270Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.0% | 38.0%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | State Street Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 12, 2006 | Jan 22, 1993 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 12, 2006 to Sep 4, 2026 (19.9 years).
PYZ vs SPY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.9 years both funds cover.
PYZ vs SPY Performance
Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF (PYZ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year PYZ returned +22.57% while SPY returned +19.97%. Year to date, PYZ is up 11.19% versus a gain of 13.34% for SPY.
Over three years, PYZ compounded at +15.57% per year against +21.20% for SPY; over five years the annualized figures are +7.94% and +12.81% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, SPY has the edge at +9.50% annualized vs +8.60%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PYZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.0% compared with 15.4% for SPY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -65.7% for PYZ and -56.5% for SPY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PYZ charges 0.60% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $9 annually, a gap of $51 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PYZ currently yields 0.50% against 1.01% for SPY.
Holdings Overlap
30.3% of PYZ's money is in holdings SPY also owns. 1.0% of SPY's money is in holdings PYZ also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
11 positions in common, counted across the 43 positions we hold weights for in PYZ and 504 in SPY, against full books of 44 and 505.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 43 and 504 positions we hold weights for.
SPY holds 485 positions PYZ does not, 98.4% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 7.71%, AAPL 6.83%, MSFT 5.50%, AMZN 4.08%, GOOGL 3.33%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PYZ | Weight in SPY | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NUENucor Corp. | 3.80% | 0.09% | 3.71% |
| STLDSteel Dynamics, Inc. | 3.78% | 0.05% | 3.73% |
| CTVACorteva Inc Ctva | 3.27% | 0.08% | 3.19% |
| APDAir Products & Chemicals Inc. | 3.05% | 0.10% | 2.95% |
| DDDupont De Nemours Inc Npv | 2.99% | 0.03% | 2.96% |
| CFCf Industries Holdings Inc. | 2.91% | 0.03% | 2.88% |
| NEMNewmont Corp Common | 2.61% | 0.16% | 2.45% |
| LINLinde Plc Ordinary Shares | 2.28% | 0.34% | 1.94% |
| ECLEcolab, Inc. | 1.97% | 0.11% | 1.86% |
| ALBAlbemarle Corp. | 1.91% | 0.02% | 1.89% |
30.3% of PYZ is already inside SPY.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PYZ or SPY?
PYZ has an expense ratio of 0.60% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option, by $51 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PYZ or SPY?
Over the past year PYZ returned +22.57% vs +19.97% for SPY, so PYZ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), PYZ annualized +8.60% vs +9.50% for SPY. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PYZ or SPY?
PYZ has been the more volatile fund at 24.0% annualized versus 15.4% for SPY. Worst drawdown: PYZ -65.7% vs SPY -56.5%.
Should I hold both PYZ and SPY?
PYZ and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between PYZ and SPY?
30.3% of PYZ's money is in holdings SPY also owns. 1.0% of SPY's is in holdings PYZ also owns. They hold 11 positions in common, counted across the 43 positions we hold weights for in PYZ and 504 in SPY.
Which pays a higher dividend, PYZ or SPY?
PYZ yields 0.50% while SPY yields 1.01%, so SPY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SPY better than PYZ?
SPY has a lower expense ratio. PYZ led over 1Y, SPY over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. SPY is less concentrated, with 38.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.