PYZ vs VOO
Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, PYZ or VOO?
Small Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PYZ | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $74M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.48% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 44 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +3.65% | +14.14%Best |
| 1Y Return | +9.55% | +17.31%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.31% | +23.16%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.37% | +13.85%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.8% | 14.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -53.9% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,947 | $19,128Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.2% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 12, 2006 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2010 to Sep 21, 2026 (16 years).
PYZ vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16 years both funds cover.
PYZ vs VOO Performance
Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF (PYZ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PYZ returned +9.55% while VOO returned +17.31%. Year to date, PYZ is up 3.65% versus a gain of 14.14% for VOO.
Over three years, PYZ compounded at +15.31% per year against +23.16% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +8.37% and +13.85% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.49% annualized vs +9.29%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PYZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.8% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.9% for PYZ and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PYZ charges 0.60% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PYZ currently yields 0.48% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
36.5% of PYZ's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 1.2% of VOO's money is in holdings PYZ also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
13 positions in common, counted across the 43 positions we hold weights for in PYZ and 494 in VOO, against full books of 44 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 43 and 494 positions we hold weights for.
VOO holds 474 positions PYZ does not, 98.0% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 7.55%, AAPL 7.05%, MSFT 5.36%, AMZN 4.13%, GOOGL 3.24%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PYZ | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FCXFreeport-mcmoran Copper & Gold Inc. | 3.57% | 0.14% | 3.43% |
| CTVACorteva Inc Ctva | 3.53% | 0.08% | 3.45% |
| NUENucor Corp. | 3.46% | 0.09% | 3.37% |
| NEMNewmont Corp Common | 3.37% | 0.16% | 3.21% |
| STLDSteel Dynamics, Inc. | 3.32% | 0.05% | 3.27% |
| APDAir Products & Chemicals Inc. | 3.18% | 0.10% | 3.08% |
| CFCf Industries Holdings Inc. | 3.20% | 0.03% | 3.17% |
| DDDupont De Nemours Inc Npv | 2.83% | 0.03% | 2.80% |
| LINLinde Plc Ordinary Shares | 2.30% | 0.34% | 1.96% |
| ALBAlbemarle Corp. | 2.13% | 0.02% | 2.11% |
36.5% of PYZ is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PYZ or VOO?
PYZ has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PYZ or VOO?
Over the past year PYZ returned +9.55% vs +17.31% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), PYZ annualized +9.29% vs +13.49% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PYZ or VOO?
PYZ has been the more volatile fund at 22.8% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: PYZ -53.9% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both PYZ and VOO?
PYZ and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between PYZ and VOO?
36.5% of PYZ's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 1.2% of VOO's is in holdings PYZ also owns. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 43 positions we hold weights for in PYZ and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, PYZ or VOO?
PYZ yields 0.48% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than PYZ?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.