QGRO vs VXUS
American Century US Quality Growth ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QGRO | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $1.9B | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.18% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 191 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +3.11% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +7.97% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.77% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.15% | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.4% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -32.6% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | American Century Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 10, 2018 | Jan 26, 2011 |
QGRO vs VXUS Performance
American Century US Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) is a ETF from American Century Investments and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QGRO returned +7.97% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, QGRO is up 3.11% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, QGRO compounded at +19.77% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +10.15% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, QGRO has the edge at +14.83% annualized vs +4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QGRO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.4% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -32.6% for QGRO and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QGRO charges 0.29% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $5 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QGRO currently yields 0.18% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QGRO or VXUS?
QGRO has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $24 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QGRO or VXUS?
Over the past year QGRO returned +7.97% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), QGRO annualized +14.83% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QGRO or VXUS?
QGRO has been the more volatile fund at 19.4% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: QGRO -32.6% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both QGRO and VXUS?
QGRO and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QGRO and VXUS?
QGRO and VXUS share 2 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 8047 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QGRO or VXUS?
QGRO yields 0.18% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.