QGRO vs SCHD
American Century US Quality Growth ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, QGRO or SCHD?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. QGRO led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, SCHD over 1Y. QGRO is less concentrated, with 29.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QGRO | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $2.1B | $112.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.19% | 3.00% |
| Holdings | 188 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +3.05% | +21.33%Best |
| 1Y Return | +3.33% | +25.15%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.85%Best | +15.43% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.88%Best | +9.32% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.3% | 16.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -32.6%Best | -33.4% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,017Best | $15,613 |
| Top 10 Weight | 29.4%Best | 41.8% |
| Fund Family | American Century Investments | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 10, 2018 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 12, 2018 to Sep 24, 2026 (8 years).
QGRO vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8 years both funds cover.
QGRO vs SCHD Performance
American Century US Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) is an ETF from American Century Investments and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year QGRO returned +3.33% while SCHD returned +25.15%. Year to date, QGRO is up 3.05% versus a gain of 21.33% for SCHD.
Over three years, QGRO compounded at +20.85% per year against +15.43% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +9.88% and +9.32% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, QGRO has the edge at +14.56% annualized vs +10.70%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QGRO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.3% compared with 16.7% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -32.6% for QGRO and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QGRO charges 0.29% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $6 annually, a gap of $23 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QGRO currently yields 0.19% against 3.00% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
4.3% of QGRO's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 42.1% of SCHD's money is in holdings QGRO also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
15 positions in common, counted across the 238 positions we hold weights for in QGRO and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 188 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 84 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for QGRO (57.8% of the fund), and 175 for QGRO that do not appear in SCHD (93.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QGRO | Weight in SCHD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMTLockheed Martin Corp | 2.29% | 2.78% | 0.49% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 0.16% | 4.77% | 4.61% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 0.16% | 4.70% | 4.54% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 0.08% | 4.17% | 4.09% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated | 0.25% | 3.82% | 3.57% |
| BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 0.72% | 3.33% | 2.61% |
| VZVerizon Communic | 0.00% | 3.97% | 3.97% |
| COPConocophillips Common Stock USD 0.01 | 0.00% | 3.94% | 3.94% |
| ACNAccenture Plc | 0.00% | 2.84% | 2.84% |
| MOAltria Group Inc | 0.00% | 2.79% | 2.79% |
42.1% of SCHD is already inside QGRO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QGRO or SCHD?
QGRO has an expense ratio of 0.29% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $23 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QGRO or SCHD?
Over the past year QGRO returned +3.33% vs +25.15% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), QGRO annualized +14.56% vs +10.70% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QGRO or SCHD?
QGRO has been the more volatile fund at 19.3% annualized versus 16.7% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: QGRO -32.6% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both QGRO and SCHD?
QGRO and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QGRO and SCHD?
42.1% of SCHD's money is in holdings QGRO also owns. 42.1% of SCHD's is in holdings QGRO also owns. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 238 positions we hold weights for in QGRO and 100 in SCHD.
Which pays a higher dividend, QGRO or SCHD?
QGRO yields 0.19% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than QGRO?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. QGRO led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, SCHD over 1Y. QGRO is less concentrated, with 29.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.