QGRO vs VTI
American Century US Quality Growth ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QGRO | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2.0B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.19% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 188 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +5.29% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | +9.61% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.72% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.59% | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.4% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -32.6% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | American Century Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 10, 2018 | May 24, 2001 |
QGRO vs VTI Performance
American Century US Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) is a ETF from American Century Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QGRO returned +9.61% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, QGRO is up 5.29% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Over three years, QGRO compounded at +20.72% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +10.59% and +12.34% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, QGRO has the edge at +15.10% annualized vs +8.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QGRO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.4% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -32.6% for QGRO and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QGRO charges 0.29% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $3 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QGRO currently yields 0.19% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
QGRO and VTI share 159 holdings out of 2816 unique holdings combined, representing a 32.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QGRO or VTI?
QGRO has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $26 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QGRO or VTI?
Over the past year QGRO returned +9.61% vs +22.43% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), QGRO annualized +15.10% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QGRO or VTI?
QGRO has been the more volatile fund at 19.4% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: QGRO -32.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both QGRO and VTI?
QGRO and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between QGRO and VTI?
QGRO and VTI share 159 common holdings with a 32.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2816 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QGRO or VTI?
QGRO yields 0.19% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.