QQQ vs RNIN
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. RNIN delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | RNIN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.68% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $199M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 0.80% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 82 | |
| YTD Return | +16.64% | +36.88% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.27% | +44.80% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.96% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.54% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 11.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -5.7% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Bushido Capital | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | May 14, 2025 |
QQQ vs RNIN Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF (RNIN) is a ETF from Bushido Capital. Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% while RNIN returned +44.80%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.64% versus a gain of 36.88% for RNIN.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 11.6% for RNIN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -5.7% for RNIN. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.01. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while RNIN charges 0.68%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $68 annually, a gap of $50 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.80% for RNIN.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and RNIN share 1 holdings out of 182 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQ | Weight in RNIN | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| WDAY | 0.15% | 1.42% | 1.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or RNIN?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while RNIN charges 0.68%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $50 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or RNIN?
Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% vs +44.80% for RNIN, so RNIN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), QQQ annualized +13.03% vs +39.20% for RNIN. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or RNIN?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 11.6% for RNIN. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs RNIN -5.7%.
Should I hold both QQQ and RNIN?
QQQ and RNIN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.01, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and RNIN?
QQQ and RNIN share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 182 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or RNIN?
QQQ yields 0.44% while RNIN yields 0.80%, so RNIN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.