RNIN vs VXUS
Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. RNIN delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RNIN | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.68% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $199M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.80% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 82 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +34.60% | +15.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +41.32% | +26.86% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.34% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.38% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -5.7% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Bushido Capital | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 14, 2025 | Jan 26, 2011 |
RNIN vs VXUS Performance
Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF (RNIN) is a ETF from Bushido Capital and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RNIN returned +41.32% while VXUS returned +26.86%. Year to date, RNIN is up 34.60% versus a gain of 15.22% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 11.3% for RNIN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -5.7% for RNIN and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.18. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RNIN charges 0.68% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $68 vs $5 annually, a gap of $63 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RNIN currently yields 0.80% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RNIN or VXUS?
RNIN has an expense ratio of 0.68% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $63 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RNIN or VXUS?
Over the past year RNIN returned +41.32% vs +26.86% for VXUS, so RNIN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), RNIN annualized +38.03% vs +4.89% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RNIN or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 11.3% for RNIN. Worst drawdown: RNIN -5.7% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both RNIN and VXUS?
RNIN and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.18, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RNIN and VXUS?
RNIN and VXUS share 2 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7948 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RNIN or VXUS?
RNIN yields 0.80% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.