RNIN vs VYM
Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, RNIN or VYM?
Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. RNIN led over 1Y and the full window. RNIN is less concentrated, with 17.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RNIN | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.68% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $197M | $83.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.75% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 82 | 608 |
| YTD Return | +30.20%Best | +9.22% |
| 1Y Return | +32.51%Best | +12.81% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.21% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.39% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.0% | 9.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -8.3% | -6.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.4 years | $14,544Best | $12,520 |
| Top 10 Weight | 17.2%Best | 26.1% |
| Fund Family | Bushido Capital | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 14, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 15, 2025 to Oct 1, 2026 (1.4 years).
RNIN vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.4 years both funds cover.
RNIN vs VYM Performance
Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF (RNIN) is an ETF from Bushido Capital and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RNIN returned +32.51% while VYM returned +12.81%. Year to date, RNIN is up 30.20% versus a gain of 9.22% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RNIN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.0% compared with 9.9% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.3% for RNIN and -6.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RNIN charges 0.68% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $68 vs $4 annually, a gap of $64 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RNIN currently yields 0.75% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
24.3% of RNIN's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.7% of VYM's money is in holdings RNIN also owns.
RNIN and VYM share little of their money.
21 positions in common, counted across the 81 positions we hold weights for in RNIN and 557 in VYM, against full books of 82 and 608.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 508 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for RNIN (96.3% of the fund), and 58 for RNIN that do not appear in VYM (72.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RNIN | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| SMSm Energy Co | 1.54% | 0.03% | 1.51% |
| OASChord Energy Corp | 1.37% | 0.03% | 1.34% |
| MTDRMatador Resources Co | 1.35% | 0.02% | 1.33% |
| HRBH&R Block, Inc. | 1.34% | 0.02% | 1.32% |
| NTAPNetapp Inc | 1.22% | 0.14% | 1.08% |
| MTCHMatch Group Inc | 1.27% | 0.04% | 1.23% |
| DLBDOLBY LABORATORIES INC-CL A | 1.27% | 0.01% | 1.26% |
| DOXAmdocs Ltd. | 1.25% | 0.02% | 1.23% |
| CNXCConcentrix Corporation | 1.20% | 0.00% | 1.20% |
| CRCCalifornia Resources Corp Common Stock | 1.17% | 0.02% | 1.15% |
24.3% of RNIN is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RNIN or VYM?
RNIN has an expense ratio of 0.68% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $64 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RNIN or VYM?
Over the past year RNIN returned +32.51% vs +12.81% for VYM, so RNIN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), RNIN annualized +30.68% vs +17.41% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RNIN or VYM?
RNIN has been the more volatile fund at 14.0% annualized versus 9.9% for VYM. Worst drawdown: RNIN -8.3% vs VYM -6.7%.
Should I hold both RNIN and VYM?
RNIN and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between RNIN and VYM?
24.3% of RNIN's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.7% of VYM's is in holdings RNIN also owns. They hold 21 positions in common, counted across the 81 positions we hold weights for in RNIN and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, RNIN or VYM?
RNIN yields 0.75% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than RNIN?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. RNIN led over 1Y and the full window. RNIN is less concentrated, with 17.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.