QQQ vs SLVR
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. SLVR delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | SLVR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.65% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $747M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 4.30% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 78 | |
| YTD Return | +19.52% | +6.76% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.68% | +87.64% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.64% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.36% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 52.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -43.7% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Sprott ETFS | |
| Category | Equity | Commodity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Jan 14, 2025 |
QQQ vs SLVR Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF (SLVR) is a ETF from Sprott ETFS. Over the past year QQQ returned +26.68% while SLVR returned +87.64%. Year to date, QQQ is up 19.52% versus a gain of 6.76% for SLVR.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SLVR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 52.9% compared with 30.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -43.7% for SLVR. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.18. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while SLVR charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $65 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 4.30% for SLVR.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and SLVR share 0 holdings out of 178 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or SLVR?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while SLVR charges 0.65%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or SLVR?
Over the past year QQQ returned +26.68% vs +87.64% for SLVR, so SLVR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QQQ annualized +13.14% vs +95.42% for SLVR. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or SLVR?
SLVR has been the more volatile fund at 52.9% annualized versus 30.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs SLVR -43.7%.
Should I hold both QQQ and SLVR?
QQQ and SLVR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.18, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and SLVR?
QQQ and SLVR share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 178 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or SLVR?
QQQ yields 0.44% while SLVR yields 4.30%, so SLVR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.