SLVR vs VXUS
Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. SLVR delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SLVR | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $747M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.30% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 78 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +6.76% | +15.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +87.64% | +26.86% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.34% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.38% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 52.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -43.7% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Sprott ETFS | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 14, 2025 | Jan 26, 2011 |
SLVR vs VXUS Performance
Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF (SLVR) is a ETF from Sprott ETFS and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SLVR returned +87.64% while VXUS returned +26.86%. Year to date, SLVR is up 6.76% versus a gain of 15.22% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SLVR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 52.9% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -43.7% for SLVR and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SLVR charges 0.65% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $5 annually, a gap of $60 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SLVR currently yields 4.30% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
SLVR and VXUS share 11 holdings out of 7934 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SLVR or VXUS?
SLVR has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $60 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SLVR or VXUS?
Over the past year SLVR returned +87.64% vs +26.86% for VXUS, so SLVR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), SLVR annualized +95.42% vs +4.89% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SLVR or VXUS?
SLVR has been the more volatile fund at 52.9% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: SLVR -43.7% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both SLVR and VXUS?
SLVR and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SLVR and VXUS?
SLVR and VXUS share 11 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7934 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SLVR or VXUS?
SLVR yields 4.30% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so SLVR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.