QQQ vs SNSR
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Global X Internet of Things ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. SNSR delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | SNSR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.68% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $224M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 0.49% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 73 | |
| YTD Return | +16.64% | +26.38% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.27% | +27.58% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.96% | +15.02% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.54% | +5.69% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 22.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -38.5% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Global X by mirae Asset | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Sep 12, 2016 |
QQQ vs SNSR Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% while SNSR returned +27.58%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.64% versus a gain of 26.38% for SNSR.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.96% per year against +15.02% for SNSR; over five years the annualized figures are +14.54% and +5.69% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs +12.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 22.6% for SNSR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -38.5% for SNSR. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while SNSR charges 0.68%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $68 annually, a gap of $50 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.49% for SNSR.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and SNSR share 5 holdings out of 151 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or SNSR?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while SNSR charges 0.68%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $50 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or SNSR?
Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% vs +27.58% for SNSR, so SNSR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), QQQ annualized +13.03% vs +12.50% for SNSR. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or SNSR?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 22.6% for SNSR. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs SNSR -38.5%.
Should I hold both QQQ and SNSR?
QQQ and SNSR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and SNSR?
QQQ and SNSR share 5 common holdings with a 1.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 151 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or SNSR?
QQQ yields 0.44% while SNSR yields 0.49%, so SNSR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.