SNSR vs VYM
Global X Internet of Things ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. SNSR delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SNSR | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.68% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $224M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.49% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 73 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +25.78% | +14.66% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.57% | +22.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.74% | +18.72% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.86% | +12.18% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.6% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -38.5% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 12, 2016 | Nov 10, 2006 |
SNSR vs VYM Performance
Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SNSR returned +26.57% while VYM returned +22.16%. Year to date, SNSR is up 25.78% versus a gain of 14.66% for VYM.
Over three years, SNSR compounded at +14.74% per year against +18.72% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +5.86% and +12.18% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, SNSR has the edge at +12.45% annualized vs +7.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SNSR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.6% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -38.5% for SNSR and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SNSR charges 0.68% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $68 vs $4 annually, a gap of $64 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SNSR currently yields 0.49% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
SNSR and VYM share 13 holdings out of 644 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SNSR or VYM?
SNSR has an expense ratio of 0.68% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $64 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SNSR or VYM?
Over the past year SNSR returned +26.57% vs +22.16% for VYM, so SNSR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), SNSR annualized +12.45% vs +7.01% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SNSR or VYM?
SNSR has been the more volatile fund at 22.6% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: SNSR -38.5% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both SNSR and VYM?
SNSR and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SNSR and VYM?
SNSR and VYM share 13 common holdings with a 3.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 644 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SNSR or VYM?
SNSR yields 0.49% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.