SNSR vs VYM
Global X Internet of Things ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, SNSR or VYM?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. SNSR led over 1Y and the full window, VYM over 3Y and 5Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SNSR | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.68% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $205M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.49% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 73 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +27.85%Best | +13.91% |
| 1Y Return | +22.80%Best | +17.57% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.65% | +18.12%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.38% | +12.17%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.5% | 14.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -38.5% | -35.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $12,995 | $17,758Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 49.2% | 25.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 12, 2016 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 16, 2016 to Sep 11, 2026 (10 years).
SNSR vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 10 years both funds cover.
SNSR vs VYM Performance
Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SNSR returned +22.80% while VYM returned +17.57%. Year to date, SNSR is up 27.85% versus a gain of 13.91% for VYM.
Over three years, SNSR compounded at +15.65% per year against +18.12% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +5.38% and +12.17% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, SNSR has the edge at +12.56% annualized vs +10.39%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SNSR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.5% compared with 14.3% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -38.5% for SNSR and -35.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SNSR charges 0.68% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $68 vs $4 annually, a gap of $64 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SNSR currently yields 0.49% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
28.5% of SNSR's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 8.7% of VYM's money is in holdings SNSR also owns.
SNSR and VYM share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 63 days apart, SNSR as of Sep 1, 2026 and VYM as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
16 positions in common, counted across the 71 positions we hold weights for in SNSR and 603 in VYM, against full books of 73 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 552 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for SNSR (88.8% of the fund), and 29 for SNSR that do not appear in VYM (36.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SNSR | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| GRMNGarmin Ltd. | 5.71% | 0.16% | 5.55% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 2.28% | 1.93% | 0.35% |
| SWKSSkyworks Solutions Inc. | 3.45% | 0.04% | 3.41% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 2.02% | 0.81% | 1.21% |
| IBMInternational Business Machines Corp. | 1.50% | 1.10% | 0.40% |
| ADIAnalog Devices, Inc. | 1.78% | 0.80% | 0.98% |
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 0.24% | 2.01% | 1.77% |
| STSensata Technologies Holding Plc | 2.03% | 0.03% | 2.00% |
| EMREmerson Electric Co. | 1.72% | 0.33% | 1.39% |
| JCIJohnson Controls International Plc | 1.68% | 0.37% | 1.31% |
28.5% of SNSR is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SNSR or VYM?
SNSR has an expense ratio of 0.68% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $64 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SNSR or VYM?
Over the past year SNSR returned +22.80% vs +17.57% for VYM, so SNSR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), SNSR annualized +12.56% vs +10.39% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SNSR or VYM?
SNSR has been the more volatile fund at 22.5% annualized versus 14.3% for VYM. Worst drawdown: SNSR -38.5% vs VYM -35.7%.
Should I hold both SNSR and VYM?
SNSR and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SNSR and VYM?
28.5% of SNSR's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 8.7% of VYM's is in holdings SNSR also owns. They hold 16 positions in common, counted across the 71 positions we hold weights for in SNSR and 603 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, SNSR or VYM?
SNSR yields 0.49% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than SNSR?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. SNSR led over 1Y and the full window, VYM over 3Y and 5Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.