IVV vs SNSR
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Global X Internet of Things ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. SNSR delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SNSR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.68% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $224M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.49% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 73 | |
| YTD Return | +12.71% | +26.38% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.89% | +27.58% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.08% | +15.02% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.96% | +5.69% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 22.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -38.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Global X by mirae Asset | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 12, 2016 |
IVV vs SNSR Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% while SNSR returned +27.58%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.71% versus a gain of 26.38% for SNSR.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.08% per year against +15.02% for SNSR; over five years the annualized figures are +12.96% and +5.69% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, SNSR has the edge at +12.50% annualized vs +7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SNSR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.6% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -38.5% for SNSR. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SNSR charges 0.68%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $68 annually, a gap of $65 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.49% for SNSR.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and SNSR share 11 holdings out of 548 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SNSR?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SNSR charges 0.68%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $65 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or SNSR?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% vs +27.58% for SNSR, so SNSR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs +12.50% for SNSR. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or SNSR?
SNSR has been the more volatile fund at 22.6% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs SNSR -38.5%.
Should I hold both IVV and SNSR?
IVV and SNSR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SNSR?
IVV and SNSR share 11 common holdings with a 1.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 548 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SNSR?
IVV yields 1.10% while SNSR yields 0.49%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.