SNSR vs VXUS
Global X Internet of Things ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, SNSR or VXUS?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. SNSR led over the full window, VXUS over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SNSR | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.68% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $205M | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.49% | 2.51% |
| Holdings | 73 | 8,747 |
| YTD Return | +25.17%Best | +13.35% |
| 1Y Return | +22.26% | +22.44%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.62% | +19.44%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.87% | +8.82%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.5% | 15.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -38.5%Best | -39.9% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $12,684 | $15,260Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 12, 2016 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 16, 2016 to Sep 10, 2026 (10 years).
SNSR vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 10 years both funds cover.
SNSR vs VXUS Performance
Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SNSR returned +22.26% while VXUS returned +22.44%. Year to date, SNSR is up 25.17% versus a gain of 13.35% for VXUS.
Over three years, SNSR compounded at +14.62% per year against +19.44% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +4.87% and +8.82% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, SNSR has the edge at +12.32% annualized vs +8.32%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SNSR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.5% compared with 15.0% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -38.5% for SNSR and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SNSR charges 0.68% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $68 vs $5 annually, a gap of $63 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SNSR currently yields 0.49% against 2.51% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 26.5% of SNSR's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 87.7% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
SNSR and VXUS share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 63 days apart, SNSR as of Sep 1, 2026 and VXUS as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
13 positions in common, counted across the 71 positions we hold weights for in SNSR and 8,091 in VXUS, against full books of 73 and 8,747.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SNSR | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| STM:ASStmicroelectronics N.v. | 7.37% | 0.01% | 7.36% |
| 2395:TWAdvantech Co Ltd | 6.61% | 0.02% | 6.59% |
| 2454:TWMediatek, Inc. | 4.16% | 0.44% | 3.72% |
| ABBN:SMAbb Ltd.[Abbn] | 1.87% | 0.37% | 1.50% |
| 3529:TWEmemory Technology Inc | 2.16% | 0.01% | 2.15% |
| LEGD:PALegrand Sa | 0.96% | 0.10% | 0.86% |
| 6723:JPRenesas Electronics Corp. Com Stk | 0.91% | 0.11% | 0.80% |
| HMSN:STHms Networks Ab | 0.92% | 0.00% | 0.92% |
| BB:CABlackberry Ltd | 0.55% | 0.02% | 0.53% |
| 064400:KRLg Cns Co Ltd | 0.32% | 0.01% | 0.31% |
26.5% of SNSR is already inside VXUS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SNSR or VXUS?
SNSR has an expense ratio of 0.68% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $63 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SNSR or VXUS?
Over the past year SNSR returned +22.26% vs +22.44% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), SNSR annualized +12.32% vs +8.32% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SNSR or VXUS?
SNSR has been the more volatile fund at 22.5% annualized versus 15.0% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: SNSR -38.5% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both SNSR and VXUS?
SNSR and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SNSR and VXUS?
At least 26.5% of SNSR's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 71 positions we hold weights for in SNSR and 8,091 in VXUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, SNSR or VXUS?
SNSR yields 0.49% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than SNSR?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. SNSR led over the full window, VXUS over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.