SNSR vs VXUS
Global X Internet of Things ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. SNSR delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SNSR | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.68% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $224M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.49% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 73 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +28.05% | +13.56% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.22% | +24.30% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.46% | +20.24% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.45% | +9.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -38.5% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 12, 2016 | Jan 26, 2011 |
SNSR vs VXUS Performance
Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SNSR returned +27.22% while VXUS returned +24.30%. Year to date, SNSR is up 28.05% versus a gain of 13.56% for VXUS.
Over three years, SNSR compounded at +15.46% per year against +20.24% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +6.45% and +9.37% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, SNSR has the edge at +12.66% annualized vs +4.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SNSR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.6% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -38.5% for SNSR and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SNSR charges 0.68% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $68 vs $5 annually, a gap of $63 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SNSR currently yields 0.49% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
SNSR and VXUS share 8 holdings out of 7915 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SNSR or VXUS?
SNSR has an expense ratio of 0.68% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $63 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SNSR or VXUS?
Over the past year SNSR returned +27.22% vs +24.30% for VXUS, so SNSR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), SNSR annualized +12.66% vs +4.79% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SNSR or VXUS?
SNSR has been the more volatile fund at 22.6% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: SNSR -38.5% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both SNSR and VXUS?
SNSR and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SNSR and VXUS?
SNSR and VXUS share 8 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7915 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SNSR or VXUS?
SNSR yields 0.49% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.