QQQ vs TOLZ
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Proshares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. TOLZ offers more diversification with 116 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | TOLZ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.46% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $175M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 2.97% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 116 | |
| YTD Return | +16.64% | +9.94% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.27% | +12.06% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.96% | +15.00% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.54% | +8.17% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 14.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -39.3% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | ProShares | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Mar 25, 2014 |
QQQ vs TOLZ Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Proshares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) is a ETF from ProShares. Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% while TOLZ returned +12.06%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.64% versus a gain of 9.94% for TOLZ.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.96% per year against +15.00% for TOLZ; over five years the annualized figures are +14.54% and +8.17% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs +4.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 14.4% for TOLZ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -39.3% for TOLZ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.54. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while TOLZ charges 0.46%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $46 annually, a gap of $28 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 2.97% for TOLZ.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and TOLZ share 3 holdings out of 212 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or TOLZ?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while TOLZ charges 0.46%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $28 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or TOLZ?
Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% vs +12.06% for TOLZ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), QQQ annualized +13.03% vs +4.69% for TOLZ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or TOLZ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 14.4% for TOLZ. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs TOLZ -39.3%.
Should I hold both QQQ and TOLZ?
QQQ and TOLZ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.54, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and TOLZ?
QQQ and TOLZ share 3 common holdings with a 0.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 212 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or TOLZ?
QQQ yields 0.44% while TOLZ yields 2.97%, so TOLZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.