TOLZ vs VYM
Proshares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, TOLZ or VYM?
VYM has been ahead.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TOLZ | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.46% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $174M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.01% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 116 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +7.71% | +13.91%Best |
| 1Y Return | +10.30% | +17.57%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.97% | +18.12%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.66% | +12.17%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.4% | 13.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -39.3% | -35.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,463 | $17,758Best |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Mar 25, 2014 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 27, 2014 to Sep 11, 2026 (12.5 years).
TOLZ vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 12.5 years both funds cover.
TOLZ vs VYM Performance
Proshares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) is an ETF from ProShares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TOLZ returned +10.30% while VYM returned +17.57%. Year to date, TOLZ is up 7.71% versus a gain of 13.91% for VYM.
Over three years, TOLZ compounded at +13.97% per year against +18.12% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +7.66% and +12.17% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +9.41% annualized vs +4.49%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TOLZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.4% compared with 13.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.3% for TOLZ and -35.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TOLZ charges 0.46% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $46 vs $4 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TOLZ currently yields 3.01% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
At least 3.1% of VYM's money is in holdings TOLZ also owns.
Stated as a floor: for TOLZ, our book for it covers 94.7% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
VYM and TOLZ share little of their money.
27 positions in common, counted across the 109 positions we hold weights for in TOLZ and 603 in VYM, against full books of 116 and 613.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in TOLZ | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| WMBWilliams Cos. Inc. | 4.23% | 0.38% | 3.85% |
| KMIKinder Morgan Inc./de | 2.94% | 0.26% | 2.68% |
| TRGPTarga Resources Corp. | 2.69% | 0.24% | 2.45% |
| SRESempra Common Stock | 2.67% | 0.25% | 2.42% |
| OKEOneok Inc. | 2.65% | 0.23% | 2.42% |
| EXCExelon Corp. | 2.26% | 0.20% | 2.06% |
| EDConsolidated Edison Inc. | 1.92% | 0.17% | 1.75% |
| ATOAtmos Energy Corp | 1.39% | 0.12% | 1.27% |
| ESEversource Energy | 1.31% | 0.11% | 1.20% |
| CNPCenterpoint Energy Inc. | 1.28% | 0.12% | 1.16% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of TOLZ and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TOLZ or VYM?
TOLZ has an expense ratio of 0.46% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, TOLZ or VYM?
Over the past year TOLZ returned +10.30% vs +17.57% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), TOLZ annualized +4.49% vs +9.41% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, TOLZ or VYM?
TOLZ has been the more volatile fund at 14.4% annualized versus 13.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: TOLZ -39.3% vs VYM -35.7%.
Should I hold both TOLZ and VYM?
TOLZ and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between TOLZ and VYM?
At least 3.1% of VYM's money is in holdings TOLZ also owns. Our book for TOLZ is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 27 positions in common, counted across the 109 positions we hold weights for in TOLZ and 603 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, TOLZ or VYM?
TOLZ yields 3.01% while VYM yields 2.22%, so TOLZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than TOLZ?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.