IVV vs TOLZ
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Proshares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TOLZ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.46% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $175M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 2.97% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 116 | |
| YTD Return | +12.71% | +9.94% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.89% | +12.06% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.08% | +15.00% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.96% | +8.17% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 14.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -39.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | ProShares | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Mar 25, 2014 |
IVV vs TOLZ Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Proshares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) is a ETF from ProShares. Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% while TOLZ returned +12.06%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.71% versus a gain of 9.94% for TOLZ.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.08% per year against +15.00% for TOLZ; over five years the annualized figures are +12.96% and +8.17% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.00% annualized vs +4.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.4% for TOLZ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -39.3% for TOLZ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TOLZ charges 0.46%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $46 annually, a gap of $43 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 2.97% for TOLZ.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and TOLZ share 18 holdings out of 600 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TOLZ?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TOLZ charges 0.46%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $43 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or TOLZ?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% vs +12.06% for TOLZ, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs +4.69% for TOLZ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or TOLZ?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.4% for TOLZ. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs TOLZ -39.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and TOLZ?
IVV and TOLZ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TOLZ?
IVV and TOLZ share 18 common holdings with a 1.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 600 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TOLZ?
IVV yields 1.10% while TOLZ yields 2.97%, so TOLZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.