QQQ vs UIVM
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. UIVM delivered stronger 1-year returns. UIVM offers more diversification with 196 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | UIVM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.35% | |
| AUM | $455.8B | $333M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.41% | 3.06% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 203 | |
| YTD Return | +19.68% | +20.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.75% | +31.32% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.25% | +26.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.39% | +13.25% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 16.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -46.1% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Victory Capital Management Inc. | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Oct 24, 2017 |
QQQ vs UIVM Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM) is a ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc.. Over the past year QQQ returned +26.75% while UIVM returned +31.32%. Year to date, QQQ is up 19.68% versus a gain of 20.96% for UIVM.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +26.25% per year against +26.51% for UIVM; over five years the annualized figures are +15.39% and +13.25% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.15% annualized vs +7.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 16.0% for UIVM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -46.1% for UIVM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while UIVM charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $35 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.41% against 3.06% for UIVM.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and UIVM share 0 holdings out of 299 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or UIVM?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while UIVM charges 0.35%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $17 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or UIVM?
Over the past year QQQ returned +26.75% vs +31.32% for UIVM, so UIVM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), QQQ annualized +13.15% vs +7.71% for UIVM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or UIVM?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 16.0% for UIVM. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs UIVM -46.1%.
Should I hold both QQQ and UIVM?
QQQ and UIVM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and UIVM?
QQQ and UIVM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 299 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or UIVM?
QQQ yields 0.41% while UIVM yields 3.06%, so UIVM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.