UIVM vs VXUS
VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. UIVM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | UIVM | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $333M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.06% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 203 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +20.37% | +14.19% | |
| 1Y Return | +32.75% | +27.38% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.36% | +19.53% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.21% | +9.03% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.0% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -46.1% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Victory Capital Management Inc. | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 24, 2017 | Jan 26, 2011 |
UIVM vs VXUS Performance
VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM) is a ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc. and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year UIVM returned +32.75% while VXUS returned +27.38%. Year to date, UIVM is up 20.37% versus a gain of 14.19% for VXUS.
Over three years, UIVM compounded at +26.36% per year against +19.53% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +13.21% and +9.03% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, UIVM has the edge at +7.65% annualized vs +4.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
UIVM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.0% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -46.1% for UIVM and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
UIVM charges 0.35% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $5 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, UIVM currently yields 3.06% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
UIVM and VXUS share 139 holdings out of 7918 unique holdings combined, representing a 10.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, UIVM or VXUS?
UIVM has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $30 per year of difference.
Which performed better, UIVM or VXUS?
Over the past year UIVM returned +32.75% vs +27.38% for VXUS, so UIVM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), UIVM annualized +7.65% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, UIVM or VXUS?
UIVM has been the more volatile fund at 16.0% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: UIVM -46.1% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both UIVM and VXUS?
UIVM and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between UIVM and VXUS?
UIVM and VXUS share 139 common holdings with a 10.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7918 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, UIVM or VXUS?
UIVM yields 3.06% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so UIVM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.