QQQE vs VYM
Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, QQQE or VYM?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. QQQE led over 1Y and the full window, VYM over 3Y and 5Y. QQQE is less concentrated, with 12.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 25.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQE | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $1.5B | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.58% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 103 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +15.23%Best | +13.15% |
| 1Y Return | +21.05%Best | +17.82% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.48% | +17.99%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.81% | +12.16%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.2% | 13.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -32.1%Best | -35.7% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,564 | $17,750Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 12.3%Best | 25.9% |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Mar 21, 2012 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 21, 2012 to Sep 10, 2026 (14.5 years).
QQQE vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 14.5 years both funds cover.
QQQE vs VYM Performance
Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index ETF (QQQE) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QQQE returned +21.05% while VYM returned +17.82%. Year to date, QQQE is up 15.23% versus a gain of 13.15% for VYM.
Over three years, QQQE compounded at +15.48% per year against +17.99% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +7.81% and +12.16% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, QQQE has the edge at +13.59% annualized vs +9.89%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.2% compared with 13.1% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -32.1% for QQQE and -35.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQE charges 0.35% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $4 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQE currently yields 0.58% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
26.4% of QQQE's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 20.0% of VYM's money is in holdings QQQE also owns.
QQQE and VYM share little of their money.
28 positions in common, counted across the 103 positions we hold weights for in QQQE and 603 in VYM, against full books of 103 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 540 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for QQQE (77.5% of the fund), and 67 for QQQE that do not appear in VYM (64.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQE | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 0.91% | 7.29% | 6.38% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 0.99% | 1.93% | 0.94% |
| TXNTexas Instruments, Inc | 0.91% | 1.13% | 0.22% |
| LINLinde Plc Ordinary Shares | 0.95% | 0.99% | 0.04% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 1.13% | 0.75% | 0.38% |
| PEPPepsico Inc. | 0.94% | 0.77% | 0.17% |
| ADIAnalog Devices, Inc. | 0.90% | 0.80% | 0.10% |
| GILDGilead Sciences Inc | 0.98% | 0.65% | 0.33% |
| ADPAutomatic Data Processing, Inc. | 1.19% | 0.37% | 0.82% |
| SBUXStarbucks Corp | 1.03% | 0.48% | 0.55% |
26.4% of QQQE is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQE or VYM?
QQQE has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $31 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQE or VYM?
Over the past year QQQE returned +21.05% vs +17.82% for VYM, so QQQE leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), QQQE annualized +13.59% vs +9.89% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQE or VYM?
QQQE has been the more volatile fund at 16.2% annualized versus 13.1% for VYM. Worst drawdown: QQQE -32.1% vs VYM -35.7%.
Should I hold both QQQE and VYM?
QQQE and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQE and VYM?
26.4% of QQQE's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 20.0% of VYM's is in holdings QQQE also owns. They hold 28 positions in common, counted across the 103 positions we hold weights for in QQQE and 603 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQE or VYM?
QQQE yields 0.58% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than QQQE?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. QQQE led over 1Y and the full window, VYM over 3Y and 5Y. QQQE is less concentrated, with 12.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 25.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.