RDOG vs VOO
ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, RDOG or VOO?
Small Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. RDOG led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. RDOG is less concentrated, with 24.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RDOG | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $11M | $1.0T |
| Dividend Yield | 6.41% | 1.05% |
| Holdings | 93 | 519 |
| YTD Return | +13.76%Best | +11.07% |
| 1Y Return | +15.38%Best | +11.71% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.52% | +21.10%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.43% | +11.55%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.5% | 14.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -50.7% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $10,217 | $17,272Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 24.0%Best | 39.1% |
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 7, 2008 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2010 to Nov 9, 2026 (16.2 years).
RDOG vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16.2 years both funds cover.
RDOG vs VOO Performance
ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG) is an ETF from ALPS Advisors and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RDOG returned +15.38% while VOO returned +11.71%. Year to date, RDOG is up 13.76% versus a gain of 11.07% for VOO.
Over three years, RDOG compounded at +12.52% per year against +21.10% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +0.43% and +11.55% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.18% annualized vs +3.17%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RDOG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.5% compared with 14.0% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.7% for RDOG and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RDOG charges 0.35% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RDOG currently yields 6.41% against 1.05% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
20.0% of RDOG's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 0.6% of VOO's money is in holdings RDOG also owns.
RDOG and VOO share little of their money.
9 positions in common, counted across the 45 positions we hold weights for in RDOG and 506 in VOO, against full books of 93 and 519.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 492 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for RDOG (99.4% of the fund), and 36 for RDOG that do not appear in VOO (78.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RDOG | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CCICrown Castle International Corp | 2.45% | 0.04% | 2.41% |
| AMTAmerican Tower Corporation | 2.36% | 0.12% | 2.24% |
| EQIXEquinix, Inc. | 2.25% | 0.15% | 2.10% |
| SBACSba Communications Corp. | 2.28% | 0.03% | 2.25% |
| UDRUdr Inc. | 2.26% | 0.01% | 2.25% |
| ORealty Income Corp. | 2.17% | 0.08% | 2.09% |
| DLRDigital Realty Trust Inc. | 2.13% | 0.09% | 2.04% |
| VICIVici Properties Inc | 2.16% | 0.04% | 2.12% |
| AREAlexandria Real Estate Equities Inc | 1.90% | 0.01% | 1.89% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of RDOG and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RDOG or VOO?
RDOG has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RDOG or VOO?
Over the past year RDOG returned +15.38% vs +11.71% for VOO, so RDOG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), RDOG annualized +3.17% vs +13.18% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RDOG or VOO?
RDOG has been the more volatile fund at 18.5% annualized versus 14.0% for VOO. Worst drawdown: RDOG -50.7% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both RDOG and VOO?
RDOG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between RDOG and VOO?
20.0% of RDOG's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 0.6% of VOO's is in holdings RDOG also owns. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 45 positions we hold weights for in RDOG and 506 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, RDOG or VOO?
RDOG yields 6.41% while VOO yields 1.05%, so RDOG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than RDOG?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. RDOG led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. RDOG is less concentrated, with 24.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.