REMG vs VTI
Russell Investments Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. REMG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | REMG | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.64% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $122M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.20% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 383 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +20.24% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +38.17% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.5% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -14.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Russell Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 29, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
REMG vs VTI Performance
Russell Investments Emerging Markets Equity ETF (REMG) is a ETF from Russell Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year REMG returned +38.17% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, REMG is up 20.24% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
REMG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.5% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.1% for REMG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
REMG charges 0.64% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $64 vs $3 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, REMG currently yields 1.20% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
REMG and VTI share 4 holdings out of 3160 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, REMG or VTI?
REMG has an expense ratio of 0.64% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $61 per year of difference.
Which performed better, REMG or VTI?
Over the past year REMG returned +38.17% vs +21.39% for VTI, so REMG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), REMG annualized +41.44% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, REMG or VTI?
REMG has been the more volatile fund at 20.5% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: REMG -14.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both REMG and VTI?
REMG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between REMG and VTI?
REMG and VTI share 4 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 3160 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, REMG or VTI?
REMG yields 1.20% while VTI yields 1.07%, so REMG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.