RINT vs VTI
Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. RINT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RINT | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $147M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.82% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 353 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +12.75% | +14.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.23% | +24.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.12% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.1% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -11.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Russell Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 13, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
RINT vs VTI Performance
Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF (RINT) is a ETF from Russell Investments and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RINT returned +24.23% while VTI returned +24.16%. Year to date, RINT is up 12.75% versus a gain of 14.20% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 12.1% for RINT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.9% for RINT and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RINT charges 0.49% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RINT currently yields 0.82% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
RINT and VTI share 3 holdings out of 3106 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RINT or VTI?
RINT has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RINT or VTI?
Over the past year RINT returned +24.23% vs +24.16% for VTI, so RINT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), RINT annualized +25.78% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RINT or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 12.1% for RINT. Worst drawdown: RINT -11.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both RINT and VTI?
RINT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RINT and VTI?
RINT and VTI share 3 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 3106 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RINT or VTI?
RINT yields 0.82% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.