RINT vs VOO
RINT vs VOO
Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. RINT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RINT | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $147M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.82% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 353 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +12.75% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.23% | +23.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.50% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.1% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -11.9% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Russell Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 13, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
RINT vs VOO Performance
Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF (RINT) is a ETF from Russell Investments and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RINT returned +24.23% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, RINT is up 12.75% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 12.1% for RINT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.9% for RINT and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RINT charges 0.49% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RINT currently yields 0.82% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
RINT and VOO share 3 holdings out of 828 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RINT or VOO?
RINT has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RINT or VOO?
Over the past year RINT returned +24.23% vs +23.71% for VOO, so RINT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), RINT annualized +25.78% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RINT or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 12.1% for RINT. Worst drawdown: RINT -11.9% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both RINT and VOO?
RINT and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RINT and VOO?
RINT and VOO share 3 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 828 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RINT or VOO?
RINT yields 0.82% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.