RNIN vs VOO
Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. RNIN delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RNIN | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.68% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $199M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.80% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 82 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +33.55% | +12.95% | |
| 1Y Return | +40.72% | +20.69% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.09% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.40% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.2% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -5.7% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Bushido Capital | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 14, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
RNIN vs VOO Performance
Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF (RNIN) is a ETF from Bushido Capital and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RNIN returned +40.72% while VOO returned +20.69%. Year to date, RNIN is up 33.55% versus a gain of 12.95% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 11.2% for RNIN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -5.7% for RNIN and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.29. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RNIN charges 0.68% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $68 vs $3 annually, a gap of $65 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RNIN currently yields 0.80% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
RNIN and VOO share 15 holdings out of 571 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RNIN or VOO?
RNIN has an expense ratio of 0.68% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $65 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RNIN or VOO?
Over the past year RNIN returned +40.72% vs +20.69% for VOO, so RNIN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), RNIN annualized +36.79% vs +13.50% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RNIN or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 11.2% for RNIN. Worst drawdown: RNIN -5.7% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both RNIN and VOO?
RNIN and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.29, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RNIN and VOO?
RNIN and VOO share 15 common holdings with a 0.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 571 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RNIN or VOO?
RNIN yields 0.80% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.