ROKT vs VYM
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, ROKT or VYM?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. ROKT led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ROKT | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $195M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.28% | 2.24% |
| Holdings | 38 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +23.03%Best | +14.82% |
| 1Y Return | +54.56%Best | +20.84% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +37.87%Best | +18.64% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +22.48%Best | +12.28% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.6% | 15.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -43.3% | -35.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $27,563Best | $17,845 |
| Top 10 Weight | 36.2% | 25.9%Best |
| Fund Family | State Street Investment Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 19, 2018 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 23, 2018 to Sep 4, 2026 (7.9 years).
ROKT vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.9 years both funds cover.
ROKT vs VYM Performance
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ROKT returned +54.56% while VYM returned +20.84%. Year to date, ROKT is up 23.03% versus a gain of 14.82% for VYM.
Over three years, ROKT compounded at +37.87% per year against +18.64% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +22.48% and +12.28% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, ROKT has the edge at +18.48% annualized vs +11.21%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ROKT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.6% compared with 15.5% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -43.3% for ROKT and -35.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ROKT charges 0.45% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $4 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ROKT currently yields 0.28% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
23.4% of ROKT's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 2.8% of VYM's money is in holdings ROKT also owns.
ROKT and VYM share little of their money.
9 positions in common, counted across the 38 positions we hold weights for in ROKT and 603 in VYM, against full books of 38 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 561 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for ROKT (94.7% of the fund), and 27 for ROKT that do not appear in VYM (72.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ROKT | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMTLockheed Martin Corp | 3.48% | 0.43% | 3.05% |
| NOCNorthrop Grumman Corp. | 3.14% | 0.28% | 2.86% |
| IRDMIridium Communications Inc | 3.36% | 0.02% | 3.34% |
| LHXL3Harris Technologies Inc. | 2.92% | 0.22% | 2.70% |
| ADIAnalog Devices, Inc. | 2.12% | 0.80% | 1.32% |
| GDGeneral Dynamics Corp. | 2.46% | 0.38% | 2.08% |
| HIIHuntington Ingalls Industries Inc. | 2.44% | 0.05% | 2.39% |
| HONHoneywell International Inc. | 1.87% | 0.29% | 1.58% |
| HONAHoneywell Aerospace Inc | 1.63% | 0.29% | 1.34% |
23.4% of ROKT is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ROKT or VYM?
ROKT has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $41 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ROKT or VYM?
Over the past year ROKT returned +54.56% vs +20.84% for VYM, so ROKT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), ROKT annualized +18.48% vs +11.21% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ROKT or VYM?
ROKT has been the more volatile fund at 24.6% annualized versus 15.5% for VYM. Worst drawdown: ROKT -43.3% vs VYM -35.7%.
Should I hold both ROKT and VYM?
ROKT and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ROKT and VYM?
23.4% of ROKT's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 2.8% of VYM's is in holdings ROKT also owns. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 38 positions we hold weights for in ROKT and 603 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, ROKT or VYM?
ROKT yields 0.28% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than ROKT?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. ROKT led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.