ROKT vs VTI
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, ROKT or VTI?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. ROKT led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ROKT | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $174M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.28% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 38 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +18.62%Best | +12.51% |
| 1Y Return | +36.90%Best | +15.23% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +39.68%Best | +22.50% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +21.73%Best | +12.31% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.6% | 17.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -43.3% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $26,729Best | $17,869 |
| Top 10 Weight | 36.9% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | State Street Investment Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 19, 2018 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 23, 2018 to Oct 1, 2026 (7.9 years).
ROKT vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.9 years both funds cover.
ROKT vs VTI Performance
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ROKT returned +36.90% while VTI returned +15.23%. Year to date, ROKT is up 18.62% versus a gain of 12.51% for VTI.
Over three years, ROKT compounded at +39.68% per year against +22.50% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +21.73% and +12.31% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, ROKT has the edge at +17.75% annualized vs +14.36%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ROKT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.6% compared with 17.1% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -43.3% for ROKT and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ROKT charges 0.45% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ROKT currently yields 0.28% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
97.8% of ROKT's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 2.3% of VTI's money is in holdings ROKT also owns.
Most of ROKT is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
36 positions in common, counted across the 38 positions we hold weights for in ROKT and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 38 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,124 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for ROKT (95.2% of the fund), and 1 for ROKT that do not appear in VTI (0.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ROKT | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FETForum Energy Technologies Inc | 4.44% | 0.00% | 4.44% |
| OIIOceaneering Intl Inc. | 4.40% | 0.01% | 4.39% |
| RTXRaytheon Co. | 3.77% | 0.40% | 3.37% |
| DCODucommun Incorporated Com | 3.80% | 0.00% | 3.80% |
| BABoeing Co | 3.41% | 0.24% | 3.17% |
| LMTLockheed Martin Corp | 3.39% | 0.19% | 3.20% |
| IRDMIridium Communications Inc | 3.51% | 0.01% | 3.50% |
| HXLHexcel Corp | 3.43% | 0.01% | 3.42% |
| TDYTeledyne Technologies Inc | 3.40% | 0.04% | 3.36% |
| HEIHeico Corp. | 3.33% | 0.03% | 3.30% |
97.8% of ROKT is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ROKT or VTI?
ROKT has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ROKT or VTI?
Over the past year ROKT returned +36.90% vs +15.23% for VTI, so ROKT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), ROKT annualized +17.75% vs +14.36% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ROKT or VTI?
ROKT has been the more volatile fund at 24.6% annualized versus 17.1% for VTI. Worst drawdown: ROKT -43.3% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both ROKT and VTI?
ROKT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ROKT and VTI?
97.8% of ROKT's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 2.3% of VTI's is in holdings ROKT also owns. They hold 36 positions in common, counted across the 38 positions we hold weights for in ROKT and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, ROKT or VTI?
ROKT yields 0.28% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than ROKT?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. ROKT led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.