ROKT vs VOO
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. ROKT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ROKT | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $233M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.26% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 39 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +36.29% | +13.44% | |
| 1Y Return | +75.38% | +22.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +41.81% | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +24.43% | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.9% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -43.3% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | State Street Investment Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 19, 2018 | Sep 7, 2010 |
ROKT vs VOO Performance
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ROKT returned +75.38% while VOO returned +22.62%. Year to date, ROKT is up 36.29% versus a gain of 13.44% for VOO.
Over three years, ROKT compounded at +41.81% per year against +21.47% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +24.43% and +13.27% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, ROKT has the edge at +20.22% annualized vs +13.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ROKT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.9% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -43.3% for ROKT and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ROKT charges 0.45% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ROKT currently yields 0.26% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
ROKT and VOO share 4 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ROKT or VOO?
ROKT has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $42 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ROKT or VOO?
Over the past year ROKT returned +75.38% vs +22.62% for VOO, so ROKT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), ROKT annualized +20.22% vs +13.55% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ROKT or VOO?
ROKT has been the more volatile fund at 24.9% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: ROKT -43.3% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both ROKT and VOO?
ROKT and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ROKT and VOO?
ROKT and VOO share 4 common holdings with a 1.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ROKT or VOO?
ROKT yields 0.26% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.