RONB vs VTI

RONB vs VTI

Which is better, RONB or VTI?

Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 79.2%.

Lower Fees: VTILess Concentrated: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricRONBVTI
Expense Ratio1.00%0.03%Best
AUM-$690.1B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.03%
Holdings443,524
YTD Return+2.06%+14.43%Best
1Y Return-+18.05%
3Y Return (annualized)-+22.93%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.74%
Top 10 Weight79.2%33.3%Best
Fund FamilyBaron FundsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionDec 12, 2025May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

RONB vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

RONB vs VTI Performance

Baron First Principles ETF (RONB) is an ETF from Baron Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, RONB is up 2.06% versus a gain of 14.43% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

RONB charges 1.00% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $3 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RONB currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

RONB already in VTI47.5%
VTI already in RONB1.8%

47.5% of RONB's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 1.8% of VTI's money is in holdings RONB also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

16 positions in common, counted across the 21 positions we hold weights for in RONB and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 44 and 3,524.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 1,137 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for RONB (95.6% of the fund), and 2 for RONB that do not appear in VTI (42.7%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in RONBWeight in VTIDifference
TSLATesla Inc9.00%1.22%7.78%
MSCIM S C I Inc.4.37%0.06%4.31%
SCHWSchwab Strategic T4.16%0.24%3.92%
FIGSFigs Inc Pp4.35%0.00%4.35%
IBKRInteractive Brokers Group Inc3.80%0.05%3.75%
HHyatt Hotels Corp. Class A3.79%0.01%3.78%
RRRRed Rock Resorts, Inc. Class A2.63%0.00%2.63%
FDSFactset Research Systems Inc.2.48%0.01%2.47%
MORNMorningstar, Inc.2.35%0.01%2.34%
ABNBAirbnb Inc2.25%0.08%2.17%

47.5% of RONB is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

RONBVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, RONB or VTI?

RONB has an expense ratio of 1.00% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $97 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between RONB and VTI?

47.5% of RONB's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 1.8% of VTI's is in holdings RONB also owns. They hold 16 positions in common, counted across the 21 positions we hold weights for in RONB and 3,463 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, RONB or VTI?

RONB yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than RONB?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 79.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.