ROSC vs SPY
Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Quick Verdict
SPY has a lower expense ratio. ROSC delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPY offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ROSC | SPY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.34% | 0.09% | |
| AUM | $62M | $821.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.80% | 1.01% | |
| Holdings | 309 | 505 | |
| YTD Return | +21.31% | +14.24% | |
| 1Y Return | +30.79% | +21.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.55% | +22.10% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.63% | +13.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.1% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -46.3% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Hartford Funds | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 23, 2015 | Jan 22, 1993 |
ROSC vs SPY Performance
Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) is a ETF from Hartford Funds and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year ROSC returned +30.79% while SPY returned +21.71%. Year to date, ROSC is up 21.31% versus a gain of 14.24% for SPY.
Over three years, ROSC compounded at +16.55% per year against +22.10% for SPY; over five years the annualized figures are +9.63% and +13.21% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, SPY has the edge at +8.86% annualized vs +8.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ROSC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.1% compared with 15.3% for SPY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -46.3% for ROSC and -56.5% for SPY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ROSC charges 0.34% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $34 vs $9 annually, a gap of $25 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ROSC currently yields 1.80% against 1.01% for SPY.
Holdings Overlap
ROSC and SPY share 1 holdings out of 805 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ROSC | Weight in SPY | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| DVA | 0.26% | 0.01% | 0.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ROSC or SPY?
ROSC has an expense ratio of 0.34% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $25 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ROSC or SPY?
Over the past year ROSC returned +30.79% vs +21.71% for SPY, so ROSC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), ROSC annualized +8.32% vs +8.86% for SPY. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ROSC or SPY?
ROSC has been the more volatile fund at 18.1% annualized versus 15.3% for SPY. Worst drawdown: ROSC -46.3% vs SPY -56.5%.
Should I hold both ROSC and SPY?
ROSC and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ROSC and SPY?
ROSC and SPY share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 805 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ROSC or SPY?
ROSC yields 1.80% while SPY yields 1.01%, so ROSC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.