RPAR vs VOO
RPAR Risk Parity ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RPAR | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.52% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $574M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.58% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 138 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +4.39% | +14.48% | |
| 1Y Return | +12.54% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.25% | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.75% | +13.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.4% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -30.2% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Rpar ETF | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 12, 2019 | Sep 7, 2010 |
RPAR vs VOO Performance
RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR) is a ETF from Rpar ETF and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RPAR returned +12.54% while VOO returned +22.02%. Year to date, RPAR is up 4.39% versus a gain of 14.48% for VOO.
Over three years, RPAR compounded at +9.25% per year against +21.80% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +0.75% and +13.36% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.61% annualized vs +3.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.2% compared with 13.4% for RPAR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -30.2% for RPAR and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RPAR charges 0.52% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $52 vs $3 annually, a gap of $49 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RPAR currently yields 2.58% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
RPAR and VOO share 21 holdings out of 613 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RPAR or VOO?
RPAR has an expense ratio of 0.52% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $49 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RPAR or VOO?
Over the past year RPAR returned +12.54% vs +22.02% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), RPAR annualized +3.92% vs +13.61% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RPAR or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.2% annualized versus 13.4% for RPAR. Worst drawdown: RPAR -30.2% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both RPAR and VOO?
RPAR and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RPAR and VOO?
RPAR and VOO share 21 common holdings with a 2.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 613 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RPAR or VOO?
RPAR yields 2.58% while VOO yields 1.09%, so RPAR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.