RPV vs VTI
Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. RPV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RPV | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.8B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.27% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 126 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +18.72% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +30.74% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.29% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.44% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.1% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -76.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 1, 2006 | May 24, 2001 |
RPV vs VTI Performance
Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF (RPV) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RPV returned +30.74% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, RPV is up 18.72% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, RPV compounded at +20.29% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +12.44% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 21-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.09% annualized vs +7.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RPV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.1% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -76.8% for RPV and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RPV charges 0.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RPV currently yields 2.27% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
RPV and VTI share 111 holdings out of 2797 unique holdings combined, representing a 8.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RPV or VTI?
RPV has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RPV or VTI?
Over the past year RPV returned +30.74% vs +22.35% for VTI, so RPV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (21 years), RPV annualized +7.89% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RPV or VTI?
RPV has been the more volatile fund at 22.1% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: RPV -76.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both RPV and VTI?
RPV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RPV and VTI?
RPV and VTI share 111 common holdings with a 8.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2797 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RPV or VTI?
RPV yields 2.27% while VTI yields 1.07%, so RPV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.